Birth certificate barack obama supreme court

Capable of at least changing how the laws enacted by Congress are applied, presidential executive orders can be controversial. Where does the president get the power to issue them? The U. Constitution does not explicitly provide for executive orders.

Quick Facts

Thus, the power to issue executive orders can be interpreted by the courts as a necessary presidential power. Supreme Court has held that all executive orders must be supported either by a specific clause of the Constitution or by an act of Congress. The Supreme Court has the authority to block executive orders that it determines to exceed the Constitutional limits of presidential power or involve issues that should be handled through legislation.

As with all other official actions of the legislative or executive branches, executive orders are subject to the process of judicial review by the Supreme Court and can be overturned if found to be unconstitutional in nature or function. Updated by Robert Longley. Share Flipboard Email. Updated September 10, Obama agreed with the criticism, saying,.

This administration stands on the side not of those who seek to withhold information but with those who seek it to be known. Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency. Continue Reading. Despite multiple images officially released scans and the factcheck. As a result of the images of a birth certificate and thus its entire contents being available, a new claim developed: that the "short form" birth certificate produced is supposedly available to anybody , even those born out of state or overseas.

Nevertheless birthers continually demand that Obama release the original "long form" certificate "with the doctor's signature. The birthers further claim that the Certification of Live Birth the short-form birth certificate is not good enough to obtain a range of things, from a passport to entry to pre-schools, depending on who is making the claim. However, the certificate produced states at the bottom that it is " Prima facie evidence of the fact of birth in any court proceeding.

The birthers ignore two very important facts in their quest to insist that the certificate that has been produced still doesn't qualify:. Birthers also ignore the fact that various people have access to, and have seen, the original certificate rather than just a photograph or image which should be the same thing, really. An early claim was that Obama's birth certificate was a Certification of Live Birth not a Certificate of Live Birth , and various claims were made, from it not being of the same legal standing, to it being a forgery.

Apparently, not seeing the word they expected to see confused the birthers. Hawaii is considering changing the name to "certificate" to bring it into line with other states. In any argument with birthers it is not long before they fall back on "why doesn't Obama just release his long form certificate if he has nothing to hide"? This is the typical conspiracy-based thinking; they assume Obama's birth certificate is being hidden and then they start " just asking questions.

Comments on Birtherism: Natural born citizens | The Economist

The answer is that Obama's short form certificate is sufficient to prove he was born in Hawaii. As they are true kool-aid drinking conspiracy theorists, no amount of evidence is going to convince birthers that Obama is legitimately the President of the United States. If he produces a long form they will claim it is a fake or that a government official is being paid bribes. Once sold on a conspiracy the theorist is unlikely to abandon it, as all evidence to the contrary is just part of the larger conspiracy.

Despite the fact that the short-form certificate should have been sufficient, Barack Obama went ahead and released the long-form certificate in April [11] , in both. Sadly, but predictably, this has not ended the "debate. Apparently, one professional time-waster thought they had found the "jackpot" — Obama's Kenyan birth certificate.

World Net NutDaily made big news about it plastering it all over the front page. Much has been made of the supposed "fact" that Obama's grandmother says he was born in Kenya. Others have claimed that she has made a "sworn deposition" saying that he was born in Kenya.


  1. Pin on Who is Barack Obama.
  2. Bloomberg - Are you a robot??
  3. honoring jeep warranty in colorado springs.
  4. Navigation menu!
  5. Justices turn aside another challenge over Obama's citizenship.

This claim is false from beginning to end. There is most certainly no "sworn deposition" but there is a slightly confusing telephone conversation in which the clearest fact is that his family — grandmother included — insist he was born in the USA.

Listen to the conversation itself and decide. If this conversation is evidence of anything, it's evidence:.

Who Is Barack Obama?

Obama's birth was announced in the local press in Hawaii as can be seen here. Despite this corroboration of his Hawaiian birth, the birthers are still not convinced. While WorldNetDaily dismiss it as merely indicating that the birth had been registered in Hawaii, as the newspaper receives the announcement from the Department of Health Vital Statistics System, and they claim that it was issued with the certificate of live birth, which they have already decided is unacceptable to them.

Even Chuck Norris finds this hard to believe. The issue of where Obama was born is relevant only if a US birth is required to be a "natural born citizen. No current US legislation uses the term "natural born citizen," and it appears only once in the Constitution although basic common sense might suggest that perhaps a "natural born citizen" is someone who is born a natural citizen. The only mention of citizenship is in the 14th Amendment , Section 1, Clause It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.

The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.

Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories

Essentially being born in one of the states of the US, as Hawaii had been for two years, makes you eligible to be President once you are 35 and have lived in the country for 14 consecutive years. A few birthers have attempted to cite the midth century treatise Le droit des gens [note 3] by Emerich de Vattel. Exactly how this reconciles with the USA's rather straightforward jus soli policy as stated in the 14th amendment is something of a mystery, especially given that if Law of Nations was truly the law of the land, it would be regularly cited in court cases; considering Vattel was a proponent of "natural law" and the founders worked from English common law, this is a pretty big gap.

The more legal-minded birthers, on occasions, fall back on the Naturalization Act of in their argument of what constitutes a natural born citizen. In particular, the clause:.

follow site Obama traveled to Pakistan, back in , to visit family. The Birthers insist that travel to Pakistan in was not possible using a US passport and therefore Obama must have been traveling using another passport — presumably from a country with strong Muslim ties. Of course this is rubbish; there were no restrictions in force at the time.

Another attempt at denial of Obama's citizenship attempts to make the claim that Obama is not eligible because Obama's stepfather Lolo Soetoro had enrolled young Obama as "Barry Soetoro" in the Indonesian school system, listing him as an Indonesian citizen, and because his mother renounced U. Aside from there being no proof of Ms.

Dunham renouncing her citizenship, the young Obama would not have been affected even if she had.


  • Site Search Navigation.
  • birth records from sunderland 1948.
  • what do colombian people look like!
  • alachua county property appraiser title search.
  • Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories.
  • Furthermore, Mr. Soetoro's incorrectly listing his stepson's citizenship as Indonesian on some school forms would obviously have no effect on the latter's actual U. In supporting case law, Perkins v. Elg , U. There is a spreading of the idea that Obama has attended Columbia University as a foreign student in However, several sources, including Snopes , state the "proof" involves a card layout that did not exist in , and in fact has been manipulated from an I. A scan of Lugert's I. The card with Obama has several tell-tale signs of forgery, such as bad quality, the fact that the cross on the crown in the background has been slightly mutilated, and the text "Foreign Student" does not align properly with the purple band.

    Mentioned less frequently is a "controversy" regarding Obama's Social Security Number SSN , notably that his SSN indicates that it was issued to someone born in Connecticut, not Hawaii — ergo, it must be stolen and Obama must be an alien imposter! Here there is a kernel of truth that has been blown out of proportion.

    SSN's issued between and were indeed linked to geography — specifically, they were linked to the postal ZIP code of the person's mailing address at their time of registration. Obama's does indeed appear to indicate it is linked to Connecticut; however, when Obama registered with Social Security when he was 16 which was normal until the mid-to-late s, when children started being automatically registered right after birth , he was living in Honolulu, which has a ZIP code of — one digit off from Danbury, Connecticut's In all likelihood, it was a simple clerical error.

    There are also claims that he is using someone else's SSN; these are usually based on erroneous info from public records databases e. At least a half dozen lawsuits against the President have been tossed out of court, but on 20 January , Orly Taitz and Gary Kreep, two of the birther lawyers most opposed to Obama filed a lawsuit on Inauguration Day.

    They issued press announcements saying the judge was brave in the face of political heat to accept the case and now birthers would be able to prove their case. Their purported goal in going to court was to defend a couple of military activists encouraged by birthers who refused to ship to the Middle East on the grounds the orders did not come from a legitimate Commander in Chief. As usual, the birthers made many accusations and offered conspiracy theories hypotheses, but provided no evidence.

    Taitz and Kreep asked for a court order demanding Kenya produce Obama's birth certificate.